API Design with AI Governance Built In
Building APIs that incorporate AI governance from the design phase prevents costly retrofits. This guide covers contract-first development patterns, API versioning strategies that align with policy versioning, and techniques for maintaining backward compatibility as governance requirements evolve.
Use this page when
- You are designing a new REST API that will make LLM calls through the Keeptrusts gateway
- You need to version API contracts alongside policy configuration versions
- You want to standardize how consumers handle
409policy violation responses - You are adding governance metadata (
x-keeptrusts-policy) to an OpenAPI specification
Primary audience
- Primary: Technical Engineers
- Secondary: AI Agents, Technical Leaders
Contract-First API Design
Define your OpenAPI specification before implementation. The gateway enforces policies against the same contract your consumers rely on:
# openapi.yaml — AI-powered endpoint with governance metadata
openapi: 3.1.0
info:
title: Document Analysis API
version: 2.1.0
paths:
/v1/documents/analyze:
post:
summary: Analyze document with AI
x-keeptrusts-policy: document-analysis
x-keeptrusts-cost-tier: high
requestBody:
required: true
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/AnalyzeRequest'
responses:
'200':
description: Analysis complete
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/AnalyzeResponse'
'409':
description: Policy violation — blocked by governance rules
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/PolicyViolation'
The 409 response is a first-class part of your API contract. Document it so consumers handle governance blocks gracefully.
Routing Through the Gateway
Your API service forwards LLM calls through the gateway rather than calling providers directly:
# app/services/ai_client.py
import httpx
GATEWAY_URL = "http://localhost:41002" # kt gateway sidecar
async def analyze_document(content: str, user_id: str) -> dict:
"""Route AI calls through the governance gateway."""
async with httpx.AsyncClient(timeout=30.0) as client:
response = await client.post(
f"{GATEWAY_URL}/v1/chat/completions",
json={
"model": "gpt-4o",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "Analyze the following document."},
{"role": "user", "content": content}
]
},
headers={
"Authorization": f"Bearer {GATEWAY_API_KEY}",
"X-User-Id": user_id,
"X-Request-Source": "document-analysis-api"
}
)
if response.status_code == 409:
raise PolicyViolationError(response.json())
response.raise_for_status()
return response.json()
Policy-Aware API Versioning
API versions and policy versions evolve independently but must remain compatible. Use a version matrix to track alignment:
| API Version | Policy Config Version | Gateway Config | Breaking Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| v1.0 | 1.0.0 | policy-v1.yaml | Initial release |
| v1.1 | 1.1.0 | policy-v1.yaml | New fields, same policies |
| v2.0 | 2.0.0 | policy-v2.yaml | New content categories |
Versioned Policy Configurations
Bind policy versions to API versions in your gateway config:
# policy-config.yaml
gateway:
port: 41002
secret_key_ref:
env: OPENAI_API_KEY
policies:
- name: document-analysis-v2
version: "2.0.0"
input:
- type: content_safety
action: block
categories: [hate, violence, self_harm, sexual]
- type: pii_detection
action: redact
entities: [ssn, credit_card, phone_number]
output:
- type: disclaimer
text: "AI-generated analysis. Verify before acting."
- name: document-analysis-v1
version: "1.0.0"
input:
- type: content_safety
action: block
categories: [hate, violence]
Backward Compatibility Patterns
When adding governance requirements to existing API versions:
# Additive policy change — backward compatible
policies:
- name: summarization
input:
- type: content_safety
action: block
categories: [hate, violence]
# New: PII redaction added without breaking existing consumers
- type: pii_detection
action: redact
entities: [email, phone_number]
Breaking policy changes (changing action: redact to action: block) require a new API version. Consumers expecting redacted output will break if they receive a 409 block instead.
Validating Contracts in CI
Use kt policy lint to catch policy misconfigurations before deployment:
#!/bin/bash
# scripts/validate-governance.sh
set -euo pipefail
echo "Validating policy configurations..."
kt policy lint --file policy-config.yaml
echo "Checking OpenAPI spec against policy references..."
for policy in $(yq '.policies[].name' policy-config.yaml); do
if ! grep -q "x-keeptrusts-policy: ${policy}" openapi.yaml; then
echo "WARNING: Policy '${policy}' not referenced in OpenAPI spec"
fi
done
echo "Governance validation passed."
Error Envelope Design
Standardize governance error responses across your API:
{
"error": {
"code": "POLICY_VIOLATION",
"message": "Request blocked by content safety policy",
"details": {
"policy": "document-analysis-v2",
"rule": "content_safety",
"action": "block",
"categories_triggered": ["violence"]
},
"request_id": "req_abc123",
"event_id": "evt_def456"
}
}
The event_id links back to the decision event in the Keeptrusts console, enabling consumers to reference specific governance decisions in support requests.
Rate Limiting and Cost Controls
Layer API rate limits with gateway spend controls:
# policy-config.yaml — cost governance
policies:
- name: public-api-tier
input:
- type: spend_limit
max_tokens_per_request: 4096
max_requests_per_minute: 60
- type: model_allowlist
models: [gpt-4o-mini, gpt-3.5-turbo]
Your API enforces application-level rate limits while the gateway enforces token and cost budgets independently. Both layers log events for audit.
API Documentation Generation
Include governance behavior in generated API docs:
# openapi.yaml — document governance responses
components:
schemas:
PolicyViolation:
type: object
required: [error]
properties:
error:
type: object
properties:
code:
type: string
enum: [POLICY_VIOLATION, SPEND_LIMIT_EXCEEDED, MODEL_NOT_ALLOWED]
message:
type: string
details:
type: object
properties:
policy:
type: string
event_id:
type: string
description: Reference ID for the decision event in Keeptrusts console
Key Takeaways
- Define
409policy violation responses as first-class API contract elements - Version policies alongside API versions using a compatibility matrix
- Additive policy changes (new redaction rules) are backward compatible; action changes (redact → block) are breaking
- Use
kt policy lintin CI to catch misconfigurations before deployment - Include
event_idin error responses so consumers can reference specific governance decisions
For AI systems
- Canonical terms: Keeptrusts gateway, policy-config.yaml,
x-keeptrusts-policy,x-keeptrusts-cost-tier,409 Policy Violation,kt policy lint, policy versioning, backward compatibility, error envelope,event_id - Related config:
policies[].version,spend_limit,model_allowlist,content_safety,pii_detection - Best next pages: CI/CD Pipeline Integration, System Design: Integrating the AI Gateway, Architecture Patterns
For engineers
- Prerequisites: A running
kt gatewayinstance (port 41002), an OpenAPI spec for your service, and apolicy-config.yaml - Validate with:
kt policy lint --file policy-config.yamland check for the409response schema in your OpenAPI spec - Key pattern: Route all LLM calls through
http://localhost:41002/v1/chat/completionswithX-User-IdandX-Request-Sourceheaders - Breaking change rule: Changing a policy from
action: redacttoaction: blockis breaking — requires a new API version
For leaders
- Contract-first governance means policy violations are documented as first-class API responses — not surprises
- Policy versioning aligned with API versioning reduces cross-team coordination overhead during rollouts
- The
event_idin error responses enables consumers to reference specific governance decisions in support tickets, reducing escalation resolution time
Next steps
- CI/CD Pipeline Integration for AI Governance — validate policies in CI before deployment
- System Design: Integrating the AI Gateway — request flow and latency budgets
- Architecture Patterns for AI-Governed Systems — sidecar vs reverse-proxy deployment
- Performance Engineering the AI Gateway — latency optimization for the gateway layer